 |
 |
 |
 |
| Copyright © 2007 - 2008 Skagit Clean Water Political Action Committee - All Rights Reserved This web site is designed and maintained by volunteers exclusively |
 |
|
|
|
| The LAW LIBRARY is now at your disposal!!! |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| What is the significance of the highlighted portions of these documents???!!! |
| One need not place the Oaths of Office and Public Official Bonds under a microscope in order to uncover the answers!!! |
| It's about Law and the Constitution!!! The Constitution tells us how to deal with Public Officials who practice Statutory and Equity Law in place of Common and Constitutional Law at both the State and Federal levels!!! |
| From the outset, our First Amendment Right to a Redress of Grievances against the Skagit County Commissioners has been met with scorn! A lawful requirement that the Commissioners respond personally has been unlawfully avoided! |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| A second attempt to clarify our position in the Redress of Grievances procedure faced resistance equal to that of the first — if not outright defiance and deception! This is Your Government in Action! |
| In the third effort, the gloves came off!!! |
| LET THE LESSON BEGIN |
| RESERVED |
| PARKING |
| This page last updated 2008-04-17 |
 |
| PERMIT EXPIRED AT CLOSE OF BUSINESS THURSDAY MAY 31, 2007 |
| DING! |
 |
| When the Constitutional Rights of the people are being trampled, silence is not golden! This battle for accountability in local government is far from being over!!! With the above, we moved on to Round 4. |
| Constitutional Law is for everyone — even elected officials!!! |
| DING! |
|
 |
| RESERVED |
| PARKING |
| PERMIT EXPIRED AT CLOSE OF BUSINESS MONDAY JUNE 18, 2007 |
| The continued lack of response really asks a single question: How many careers will be ended before this mess finally reaches a conclusion? |
| DING! |
|
| What can be done you won't believe. Listen and you may see. The flames keep getting higher every day! |
 |
| RESERVED |
| PARKING |
| PERMIT EXPIRED AT CLOSE OF BUSINESS MONDAY JULY 16, 2007 |
|
| DING! |
| We do not have a paid staff like public officials. Slow but steady progress still has us moving in the right direction! |
| Each unanswered notice has represented a door, through which our public officials have been granted an opportunity to pass. Once a door closes, it is sealed shut! The final one is within visual range!!! |
| There you go, man
Keep as cool as you can Face piles of trials with smiles It riles them to believe That you perceive The web they weave... And keep on thinking free — Graeme Edge |
| OH LOOK! |
 |
| RESERVED |
| PARKING |
| PERMIT EXPIRED AT CLOSE OF BUSINESS THURSDAY AUGUST 23, 2007 |
|
 |
|
|
| By continuing to respond to you, Skagit County neither agrees with nor consents to any of the various speculations, allegations and pronouncements in your letter. — Skagit County Chief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorney William W. Honea, May 5, 2007 |
| DING! |
| WRONG ANSWER!!! |
| POLITICAL POWER All political power is inherent in the people, and governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, and are established to protect and maintain individual rights. — Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution of Washington State |
| Failure to personally respond to this letter, under penalty of perjury and notarized to guarantee authenticity, ... will be your stipulation, stare decisis, of your participation and involvement in an attack upon the People of this county in opposition to your Oath and Bond or Surety, and will force us to apply for any remedy available. — Skagit Clean Water (at the end of each notice) |
| WHAT PART OF THESE THINGS DO OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS NOT UNDERSTAND?!! WE SHALL MOVE FORWARD WITH OR WITHOUT THEIR "CONSENT"!!! FAILURE TO RESPOND PERSONALLY IS LEADING TO DEFAULT OF INDIVIDUALS — NOT THE COUNTY — AS WE APPROACH THE LAST DOOR!!! |
| BESIDES... THESE ARE STATE LAWS: |
| click on thumb for readable page |
| RCW 36.16.060 Every county officer, before entering upon the duties of his office, shall file his oath of office in the office of the county auditor and his official bond in the office of the county clerk. |
| AND... WE HAVE STATED FROM THE BEGINNING: |
| RCW 42.12.010 (6) Every elective office shall become vacant on the happening of any of the following events: His or her refusal or neglect to take his or her oath of office, or to give or renew his or her official bond, or to deposit such oath or bond within the time prescribed by law. |
| RESERVED |
| PARKING |
| PERMIT EXPIRED AT CLOSE OF BUSINESS TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 18, 2007 |
|
 |
| OH MY! |
|
| DING! |
| NEWEST DOCUMENT FIRST |
| THE GLOVES CAME OFF FOUR MONTHS AGO AND NOW, THINGS ARE GOING TO TURN UGLY!!! |
| click on thumbs for readable pages |
 |
 |
 |
| THE PROSECUTOR HAS RECEIVED AFFIDAVITS OF CRIMINAL ACTS SPECIFYING THREE STATE LAWS THAT HAVE BEEN VIOLATED BY THE IMPOSTOR COMMISSIONERS; HIS NOTICE OF DEFAULT WILL BE DELIVERED AFTER HE FAILS TO ACT (WHICH IS TOTALLY EXPECTED)!!! |
| NOSE TO NOSE WITH THE GOOD OL' BOYS |
| click on thumbs for readable pages |
 |
 |
| RESERVED |
| PARKING |
| PERMIT EXPIRED AT CLOSE OF BUSINESS WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 14, 2007 |
| click on thumbs for full size pages |
|
 |
| DING! |
|
 |
 |
| click on thumbs for full documents |
| YOUR GOVERNMENT IN ACTION THE SMOKE AND MIRRORS AND OUTRIGHT DECEIT CONTAINED IN THESE LETTERS HAVE BEEN ANSWERED! MR. HONEA CAREFULLY AVOIDED THE SUBJECT OF OATHS OF OFFICE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE! WE MUST USE APPLICABLE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, HE SAYS? SORRY, BUT WE DON'T PLAY IN THE CORPORATE ARENA! |
| Filing an oath of office after the time prescribed by law is not a compliance with the law, confers no power to act as a public officer or in a public office and any person who fails to file his oath of office within the time limits required by law creates an ipso facto vacancy and such person's acts are void and vitiate any subsequent proceedings. Parker v. Overman, 59 U.S. 137, 15 L.Ed 316 |
| READ AND WEEP ABOUT OATHS OF OFFICE, MR. HONEA: 'NO OATHS, NO OFFICE' 'TARNISHED STAR' |
| taken from the web page for The Common Law Judicature Reform Movement |
 |
 |
| RESERVED |
| PARKING |
| PERMIT EXPIRED AT CLOSE OF BUSINESS TUESDAY DECEMBER 4, 2007 |
| THE SANDS OF TIME MOVE SWIFTLY |
| click on thumb for readable page |
| Quite frankly, if it doesn't involve the removal of the impostor commissioners, we don't care one way or the other if this gets answered. We now join our regularly scheduled law suit, already in progress.... |
|
 |
 |
| Applicable statutes are controlling and may declare vacancy to exist if the person chosen for the office fails to accept or qualify as required by law. |
|
| DING! |
 |
| DAMAGE CONTROL OFFICIAL RESPONSE TO THE ARGUS FEATURE POSTED AT GOSKAGIT ON DEC 7th WAS IMMEDIATE! MORE SMOKE AND MIRRORS FROM THE CHIEF CIVIL DEPUTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY CONFIRMS APPARENT ATTACK ON THE PEOPLE VIA ABUSE OF DUE PROCESS! WE WILL NOT BE PATRONIZED OR INTIMIDATED... |
| click on thumb for full document |
| Will Honea and the Skagit County Prosecuting Attorney's Office support the impostor commissioners' bizarre argument that dental caries (tooth decay) is an infectious, contagious disease and he calls our claims absurd? Moreover, his continued misuse of State ex rel. Lysons v. Ruff, 4 Wash. 234, 29 Pac. 999 (1892) to excuse violations of State Law by the impostors in the filing of their Oaths of Office casts suspicion on the validity of any of his analyses. Washington State Supreme Court decisions in State ex rel. Guthrie v. Chapman, 187 Wash. 327, 60 P.2d 245 (1936) and State ex rel. Zempel v. Twitchell, 59 Wn. (2d) 419, 367 P. (2d) 985 (1962) are known to have established that State v. Ruff no longer conforms with State Law. The court has held that the listed items in RCW 42.12.010 do indeed lead to immediate forfeiture of office and create a vacancy. Far from "devastating" our position, Parker v. Overman, 59 U.S. 137, 15 L.Ed 316 was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Arkansas to the United States Supreme Court. The decision, which has been cited in both the States of Utah and New York, confirms that applicable statutes governing the filing requirements for Oaths of Office are controlling in all states. We did not initiate contact with Mr. Honea or "the county." Our documents have been delivered to individual persons in order to prevent them from being allowed to employ county resources in their defense, which is against the law. It is our observation that Mr. Honea has been dispatched to engage our group — again, in opposition to the law — in an attempt to maintain a cover up of acts of malfeasance that warrant the dismissal of several public officials, including his own. We can only hope that Mr. Honea will finally keep his word and send us no more of his unsolicited dolus malus. |